127,000 Tons of Undisclosed Hazardous
Emissions: Oil and Gas Would Join Other Industries, Including Coal, That
Already Report to the Toxics Release Inventory; Federal Disclosure for O&G
Not Yet Required Despite Surge in Fracking Chemical Pollution.
WASHINGTON, D.C.///October 24, 2012///The
Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), along with 16 other local, regional, and
national organizations petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
today to require the oil and gas extraction industry—including companies
engaged in fracking—to report to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). The oil
and gas extraction industry has long used and released large amounts of
TRI-listed toxic chemicals, and this has dramatically increased in the last
decade with the rapid spread of horizontal hydraulic fracturing (or
“fracking”).
Today’s petition would finally make this
information available for the first time to citizens, communities, and
lawmakers. The full text of the petition is available online at: http://www.environmentalintegrity.org/news_reports.php.
Joining EIP on the petition are the Natural
Resources Defense Council, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, CitizenShale,
Clean Air Council, Clean Water Action, Delaware Riverkeeper Network,
Earthworks, Elected Officials to Protect New York, Environmental Advocates of
New York, Lower Susquehanna Riverkeeper, OMB Watch, PennEnvironment, Powder
River Basin Resource Council, San Juan Citizens Council, Sierra Club, and Texas
Campaign for the Environment.
“The Toxics Release Inventory brings daylight
to dark corners, by requiring companies to quantify and report their pollution
to a public data base for everyone to see,” said Environmental Integrity
Project Director Eric Schaeffer. “That makes it easier for communities to
measure the environmental impact of local industries, motivates companies to
reduce their emissions, and gives all of us insight into how well our
environmental laws are working. The EPA estimates the oil and gas industry
releases 127,000 tons of hazardous air pollutants every year, second only to
power plants and more than any of the other industries already reporting to
TRI. Why shouldn’t oil and gas companies be required to report these toxic
releases under our Right-to-Know laws, like so many other industries already
do?”
The oil and gas extraction industry is a vast
and growing industrial sector, operating in most states across the U.S. Oil and
gas industry processes extend from well exploration to production and
processing up to the point at which the natural gas is ready for transport to
market or oil is ready for transport to a refinery. The advent of fracking has
allowed the industry to grow even more rapidly in the last decade, but with the
addition of greater amounts and volumes of toxic chemicals, more wastes, and a
much bigger environmental footprint.
“As a mother, wife, community member, and
individual suffering health issues caused by breathing toxic emissions, such as
benzene, from a natural gas compressor site, I am very concerned about the
impact the oil and gas industry is having on human life and the environment,”
said Pam Judy, a resident of Carmichaels, Pennsylvania. “I am dismayed that
there is not an adequate federal disclosure requirement that would provide
individuals with the information necessary to make decisions regarding their
health and safety.”
Data on the oil and gas industry (including
fracking) points to a large toxic footprint. EPA has estimated that the
industry emits 127,000 tons of hazardous air pollutants every year, including
benzene, xylenes, and hydrogen sulfide—more than any other TRI industry except
electric utilities. And EPA investigations of natural gas development in
Pavillion, Wyoming, and Dimock, Pennsylvania, found toxic chemicals and methane
present in groundwater and drinking water wells. In fact, a Congressional
report based on industry data found that the industry regularly uses products
containing at least 45 TRI-listed toxic chemicals, the most common of which
are: methanol, 2-butoxyethanol, and ethylene glycol.
“I don’t just work with Powder River Basin
Resource Council members in Pavillion, Deaver, and Clark, Wyoming, who are
severely impacted by contamination from oil and gas development. I also live
with it,” said Deb Thomas, Powder River Basin Resource Council organizer and
resident of Clark, Wyoming. “For those of us who fear our health is being
affected by this industry, disclosure of the chemicals and constituents used
during development is extremely important. We need to know what we’re being
exposed to so that physicians can diagnose and treat our health problems and we
can make informed decisions about staying in the communities we live in. It is
a human right to know what toxic materials are being stored and used where we
live and work.”
In spite of these significant quantities of
toxic chemicals used and released, the industry is one of the few energy or
extraction sectors that do not report to the TRI. For example, electric
utilities, coal mining, and metal mining have all reported to the TRI for
nearly fifteen years. The oil and gas extraction industry is also uniquely
exempt from many key provisions of our major environmental laws, including the
Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, and the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act.
“Western Maryland currently has the highest
targeted amount of shale gas within the state, and development activities will
likely be centered in rural communities like Garrett County. Unfortunately, the
county does not have the information or ability to address the storage of large
volumes of chemicals, which may appeal to companies looking to stage drilling
and processing activities within Maryland,” said Eric Robison, CitizenShale
president and resident of Garrett County, Maryland. “The reporting provided by
the TRI would allow a community like Garrett County to, first, be informed and,
second, be prepared.”
Today’s petition requests that the industry’s
facilities report their releases of toxic chemicals to the TRI, as electric
utilities and coal mining already do. The reporting requirement is annual,
procedural, and simply requires disclosure. These reports would provide a
valuable resource to communities, lawmakers, and the companies themselves. For
example, if a gas company were to propose a facility in a municipality, a
community member or local decision maker could pull up the company’s past TRI
reports and judge whether the facility would be a good neighbor. Or the company
itself could compare its releases against other facilities and determine
whether it is in line with the industry standard. Above all, the petition would
serve a fully informed public and industry responsibility.
The TRI was enacted in 1986 as Congress’s
response to the Bhopal disaster that exposed hundreds of thousands of people to
toxic chemicals. The TRI requires each industrial facility to report annually
on its releases of over 650 TRI-listed toxic chemicals to the air, land, water,
landfills, treatment plants, and other sites. The reports published in the
Inventory are available online, providing basic but essential information about
the environmental “footprint” of facilities.
ABOUT EIP
The Environmental Integrity Project (http://www.environmentalintegrity.org)
is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March of 2002 by former
EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for effective enforcement of
environmental laws. EIP has three goals: (1) to provide objective analyses of
how the failure to enforce or implement environmental laws increases pollution
and affects public health; (2) to hold federal and state agencies, as well as
individual corporations, accountable for failing to enforce or comply with
environmental laws; and (3) to help local communities obtain the protection of
environmental laws.
|